Envious Of Celebs? Check Out Elohiym’s Foretellin!

¹Truly Elohiym is good to [the children of  a man named] Israel, even to such as are of a clean heart.

²But as for me, my feet were almost gone; my steps had well nigh slipped.

³For I was envious at the foolish, when I saw the prosperity of the witches.

⁴For there are no bands in their death: but their strenth is firm.

⁵They are not in trouble as other men; neither are they plagued like other men.

⁶Therefore pride compasses them about as a chain; violence covers them as a garment.

⁷Their eyes stand out with fatness: they have more than heart could wish.

⁸They are corrupt, and speak wickedly concernin oppression: they speak loftily.

⁹They set their mouth against the heavens, and their tongue walks through the earth.

¹⁰Therefore his people return hither: and waters of a full cup are wrun out to them.

¹¹And they say, How does Elohiym know? and is there knowledge in the most High?

¹²Behold, these are the ungodly, who prosper in the world; they increase in riches.

¹³Verily I have cleansed my heart in vain, and washed my hands in innocency.

¹⁴For all the day lon have I been plagued, and chastened every mornin.

¹⁵If I say, I will speak thus; behold, I should offend against the generation of your children.

¹⁶When I thought to know this, it was too painful for me;

¹⁷Until I went into the sanctuary of Elohiym; then understood I their end.

¹⁸Surely you did set them in slippery places: thou casted them down into destruction.

¹⁹How are they brought into desolation, as in a moment! they are utterly consumed with terrors.

²⁰As a dream when one awakens; so, O Greatest King, when you awaken, thou shall despise their image.

²¹Thus my heart was grieved, and I was pricked in my reins.

²²So foolish was I, and ignorant: I was as a beast before you.

²³Nevertheless I am continually with you: you have held me by my right hand.

^24You shall guide me with your counsel, and afterward receive me to glory.

²⁵Whom have I in heaven but you? and there is none upon earth that I desire beside you.

²⁶My flesh and my heart fail: but Elohiym is the strenth of my heart, and my portion for ever.

²⁷For, lo, they that are far from you shall perish: you have destroyed all them that go a whorin from you.

²⁸But it is good for me to draw near to Elohiym: I have put my trust in the Greatest King, Elohiym, that I may declare all your works.

Observation on Erik Brokovich

by Steve Quizodlibumpbumpbump

Theme:  Dominance-Of-Ego Is The Dark Side

I did not watch Erin Brokovich.  My friend told, to me, that no background music was in it.  Doubtin that statement, I went to youtube, and found not the whole movin picture, but choice parts thereof, and found no background music.

I did not find the whole movin picture “Erin Brokovich”, but the tastiest segments thereof.  ‘Twas after background music, that I sought.  Sprisinly, no background music found Steve Quizodlibumpbumpbump, as you said.  It was all about dialogue, voice, and inflection.

The folks, who have come, to be pre-eminent in the mass-media, are those same, who bait the hook.

They have recognized that there is a problem for many women, I won’t try to define it here, but they present that movin picture, as a solution to the problem.  That is why it has the appeal.  It presents a solution to a certain problem.  That is the bait.

Now the hook is that the 98% “food” is laced with 2% “rat poison”.  That is for folks, who like mixed metaphora.  There is so much cussin, in that movin picture — I have observed that cussin comes when somebody, even without bein aware of it, goes over to the “dark side”.  Could there be exceptions, yes.  But in general, “if you associate with those, who curse, your life will be cursed“.

The botham line is, maybe the movin picture can help you to define what is the problem, but a safe solution must be sought elsewhere, than amon those, who have taen hold of the mass media, and their ilk, that is to say, witches, luciferians, satanists, agnostics, and atheists.  Those are the “dark side”.  White witches fool themselves, it is all separation and dominance of ego.  Dominance of ego is the dark side.

Vote On Horror And Dark Film Avoidance Policy!

The Nature Of The Muse

Robert Graves, in his book on the Greek myths, said the muses were originally the triple goddesse, in her orgiastic aspect.

After we see the historical pattern, of conflict, between God and the devil, played out in the Mediterranean region, we get to see, that the orgy is not a way that is “of us”.

I studied quite a few topics in the Graves book, by lookin in the index, and ignorin the myths, themselves, but readin Robert’s numbered notes on each of my chosen topics.

It was easy to find a duality between matriarchy, goddesse-worship, serpent-worship, orgy, abandon, and human sacrifice, on the one hand,

…versus patriarchy, god-worship, order, and non-human sacrifice, on the other.

It is the connection, between matriarchy and snake-worship, that identifies the devil as the source of it.

I suspect, that many, of the gods, of the patriarchal side, were originally embodiments of the Supreme Bein, same as Jesus, Krsna, Buddha, Mohammed, Sri Hans, and Prem Rawat.

It is a fact, which you can find in scriptures, I believe that Mahabharata is one of them, that the Supreme Lord is embodied again and again, without any lag time in-between — no “lame duck” time.

How does this reconcile with the promise, of Jesus, that he would be gone, but would come back?  It means he would embody amon other folks, other than the Israelites, for a while, then come back, to the Israelites, which he did in 1971.

By “he”, I don’t mean an exact replica of the erst form of Jesus, but any embodiment of the Supreme Bein.

Thus, Thor, Wotan, and Zeus — any one of them — may have been embodiments of the Supreme Bein.  It is always a male, so Athena could not have been one.  There is documentation, about the historical Athena, in the Oera Linda Book.

We need your comments to this postin, so please click the “leave a comment” link, lower right, and thanks to you, for it!

Teachin Folks To Listen, Through Film

There has been too much talkin.  In movin pictures, the sum, of talkin, must oft be more, than would be wise, or tasteful, in real life.

Put it differently, oft dialogue must be more, in a movin picture, than sensibility would allow, outside of film.

Many folks have been seen to double the doins, that they saw in movin pictures.  They have doubled those doins in their own lives, oustide of film.

We do not want to only train folks to be talkers.  Folks need to listen more.  How can we train them to listen, without shortenin the dialogue, in a movin picture?

Here is my thought:  show a conversation, amon several folks.  One, of them, speaks not, but only listens.  While the others talk, the camera stays on the listener’s face, not on the speakers’.

Will that help, to train folks to listen?  What is your opinion?

Comment on this thought, I beg of you!   We need your comments to this postin, so please click the “leave a comment” link, lower right, and thanks to you, for it!

Film Artists Brainstorm A Movin Picture Here!

This post is just a start, to “kick off” the conversation.  We shall brainstorm the best movin picture ever to have been made.

Here are some parameters, I would like to see, in a movin picture:

1)  Each shot is either a Jung Mandala, or is part of a sequence, that forms a Jungian mandala.

2)  Subliminal messages in the dialogue are all positive affirmations.  For example, if the first word in each sentence, or the most emphasized words in a dialogue, form a hidden sentence:

WE don’t APPRECIATE YOU bein here.

Or:

Phyllis:  WE haven’t seen you in a while, Ted

Glenda:  APPRECIATE what we have been goin through.

Ted:  YOU got it, Sweetys!

Bible’s stories don’t work as films.  For a limited audience they do.  Gibson’s film didn’t work, only the publicity worked.

However, Bible’s stories can be narrated within the context of another story, that happens in another period.

The spoof of Terminator and Jesus worked really well to get a few points across, about the common stereotype of Jesus.  For me, just showin the story itself would have been less interestin.

It could depend upon what the audience is used to.  Folks, who hear Bible’s stories all the time, might be more open to the straight presentation.

Thus, to present a Bible’s story, present a lot of them, and be sure, that they are seen often, and eventually the format will become familiar.

Is the latter true?  It would need to be tested.

Film folks, let me see your comments in this conversation, and thanks to you, in advance, therefor.  We need your comments to this postin, so please click the “leave a comment” link, lower right, and thanks to you, for it!

Expose Of Abuse Of Actors, By Devils

“Hollywood Unmasked”

Here I give to you the first part.  You can find the followin parts in the lower right column of the video page.  We need your comments to this postin, so please click the “leave a comment” link, lower right, and thanks to you, for it!