Whose Side Are the Muses on?

Folks Are Becomin Aware of the Ages-Old War

Today is the time, when we find out who is on our side and who is foe in the war.

How Can We Persuade Others to Be Sane?

We don’t convince anybody.  We hear what they say.  If they praise the weapons of our foe, then we do not tolerate them, we separate from them.

Now if they are good at bottom and goin through possession or delusion, we can ask Breathgiver whether it is his delight to make them to be free from it.

Be a Bit of a Greater Whole

If you are willin to start a group of creative folks who rely upon Breathgiver for their inspiration, come and network and coordinate our efforts toward the establishment of the global celebration.  Ask Tru Keesey for a plan trukeesey [at] verizon [dot] net and put “Spurn the Muse Plan” in the subject line.

Backtale on Muses

Muses are on team of foe.  Here is article:   The Nature of the Muse.

 

Published in: on June 1, 2016 at 3:49 am  Leave a Comment  

Chad Vader

Some folks have not yet gotten the lore, that Darth Vader has a younger brother Chad.  Here he appears in his most popular role.

Tell Your Message!

Please remember to tell how you feel and what you think of this topic in the “Comments” spot below.  Thank you!

 

Published in: on May 29, 2016 at 9:56 pm  Leave a Comment  

A Review on Love and Other Drugs

by (Adapted from) Guest Writer

My first impression on the movie when I saw its title is that it’s about love and illegal drugs. I was also half-expecting this movie to be an excuse for the makers to make Anne Hathaway and Jake Gyllenhaal appear naked on screen.

I was pleasantly surprised though that I enjoyed the movie and gained some pharmaceutical knowledge along the way. I learned that Zoloft has been around for years and it can increase the likelihood of suicide in teen users (as mentioned by Jake’s character to another rep), why one should not take multiple doses of Viagra in one go and just how dirty the pharmaceutical field can get.

Love and Other Drugs tells the tale of Jaime Randall (Jake Gyllenhaal) that happened around 1997. The movie starts with Jamie as an electronics salesman and being a jerk by having sex with his manager’s girlfriend. A typical good-looking jerk that is charismatic and smart but without much care with his life or relationships.

Coming from a family of achievers and freshly unemployed, he decides to take on the job of a drug salesman for Pfizer. The story changed when she met the headstrong Maggie Murdoc (Anne Hathaway)in a clinic while she’s waiting for her medications as she has early-onset Parkinson’s disease.

They had one night then pursued a serious relationship while faced with a lot of dilemmas such as Maggie’s fear of commitment and Jamie’s struggle to prove himself, not to be mention her failing state of health.

For the most part, I was enjoying myself with the witty banter and the steamy scenes between the two. One scene I found amusing was when Jaime had panic attacks when he said “I love you” to Maggie and Maggie replied “I said I love you to a cat once” to calm him down.

However, the film suddenly became serious as they started finding ways on how to manage Maggie’s worsening Parkinson’s disease. It’s not that I’m against the emotional side of it because I think it’s appropriate, but the way the movie suddenly became serious was not properly transitioned in my opinion.

It’s no secret that both Jake and Anne complement each other on the screen. I just wish for a more solid material next time for both actors so we’ll see what they’re really made off.  This movie was based on the non-fiction book by Jamie Reidy, Hard Sell: The Evolution of a Viagra Salesman, which means that this is a true tale

The movie was set in 1997 but the mentioned drugs are still around, some are believed to cause side effects such as in Zoloft birth defects.  Also, I would like to believe that Love and Other Drugs became an advertisement for Pfizer as Zoloft and Viagra were repeatedly mentioned in the movie.

Published in: on November 21, 2014 at 10:54 pm  Leave a Comment  

Envious Of Celebs? Check Out Elohiym’s Foretellin!

1Truly Elohiym is good to [the children of  a man named] Israel, even to such as are of a clean heart.

2But as for me, my feet were almost gone; my steps had well nigh slipped.

3For I was envious at the foolish, when I saw the prosperity of the witches.

4For there are no bands in their death: but their strenth is firm.

5They are not in trouble as other men; neither are they plagued like other men.

6Therefore pride compasses them about as a chain; violence covers them as a garment.

7Their eyes stand out with fatness: they have more than heart could wish.

8They are corrupt, and speak wickedly concernin oppression: they speak loftily.

9They set their mouth against the heavens, and their tongue walks through the earth.

10Therefore his people return hither: and waters of a full cup are wrun out to them.

11And they say, How does Elohiym know? and is there knowledge in the most High?

12Behold, these are the ungodly, who prosper in the world; they increase in riches.

13Verily I have cleansed my heart in vain, and washed my hands in innocency.

14For all the day lon have I been plagued, and chastened every mornin.

15If I say, I will speak thus; behold, I should offend against the generation of your children.

16When I thought to know this, it was too painful for me;

17Until I went into the sanctuary of Elohiym; then understood I their end.

18Surely you did set them in slippery places: thou casted them down into destruction.

19How are they brought into desolation, as in a moment! they are utterly consumed with terrors.

20As a dream when one awakens; so, O Greatest King, when you awaken, thou shall despise their image.

21Thus my heart was grieved, and I was pricked in my reins.

22So foolish was I, and ignorant: I was as a beast before you.

23Nevertheless I am continually with you: you have held me by my right hand.

24You shall guide me with your counsel, and afterward receive me to glory.

25Whom have I in heaven but you? and there is none upon earth that I desire beside you.

26My flesh and my heart fail: but Elohiym is the strenth of my heart, and my portion for ever.

27For, lo, they that are far from you shall perish: you have destroyed all them that go a whorin from you.

28But it is good for me to draw near to Elohiym: I have put my trust in the Greatest King, Elohiym, that I may declare all your works.

Published in: on December 13, 2011 at 10:29 pm  Leave a Comment  

Observation on Erik Brokovich

by Steve Quizodlibumpbumpbump

Theme:  Dominance-Of-Ego Is The Dark Side

I did not watch Erin Brokovich.  My friend told, to me, that no background music was in it.  Doubtin that statement, I went to youtube, and found not the whole movin picture, but choice parts thereof, and found no background music.

I did not find the whole movin picture “Erin Brokovich”, but the tastiest segments thereof.  ‘Twas after background music, that I sought.  Sprisinly, no background music found Steve Quizodlibumpbumpbump, as you said.  It was all about dialogue, voice, and inflection.

The folks, who have come, to be pre-eminent in the mass-media, are those same, who bait the hook.

They have recognized that there is a problem for many women, I won’t try to define it here, but they present that movin picture, as a solution to the problem.  That is why it has the appeal.  It presents a solution to a certain problem.  That is the bait.

Now the hook is that the 98% “food” is laced with 2% “rat poison”.  That is for folks, who like mixed metaphora.  There is so much cussin, in that movin picture — I have observed that cussin comes when somebody, even without bein aware of it, goes over to the “dark side”.  Could there be exceptions, yes.  But in general, “if you associate with those, who curse, your life will be cursed“.

The botham line is, maybe the movin picture can help you to define what is the problem, but a safe solution must be sought elsewhere, than amon those, who have taen hold of the mass media, and their ilk, that is to say, witches, luciferians, satanists, agnostics, and atheists.  Those are the “dark side”.  White witches fool themselves, it is all separation and dominance of ego.  Dominance of ego is the dark side.

Published in: on January 18, 2011 at 7:04 am  Leave a Comment  

Vote On Horror And Dark Film Avoidance Policy!

Published in: on February 5, 2010 at 2:39 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , , , , ,

The Nature Of The Muse

Muses Were Orgiastic

Robert Graves, in his book on the Greek myths, said the muses were originally the triple goddesse, in her orgiastic aspect.

The War

After we see the historical pattern, of conflict, between Breathgiver and the devil, played out in the Mediterranean region, we get to see, that the orgy is not a way that is “of us”.

Studied the Background of the Myths

I studied quite a few topics in the Graves book, by lookin in the index, and ignorin the myths, themselves, but readin Robert’s numbered notes on each of my chosen topics.

The Two Armies

It was easy to find a duality between matriarchy, goddesse-worship, with serpent-worship, orgy, abandon, and human sacrifice, on the one hand,

…versus patriarchy, god-worship, order, and non-human sacrifice, on the other.

Orgies and Snakes Have Gone Together

It is the connection, between matriarchy and snake-worship, that identifies the devil as the source of it.

“Many Past Forms You Have Taken”

I suspect, that many, of the gods, of the patriarchal side, were originally embodiments of the Supreme Bein, same as Jesus, Krsna, Buddha, Mohammed, Sri Hans, and Prem Rawat.

It is a fact, which you can find in scriptures, I believe that Mahabharata is one of them, that the Supreme Lord is embodied again and again, without any lag time in-between — no “lame duck” time.

Where Was Jesus While He Was Away?

How does this reconcile with the promise, of Jesus, that he would be gone, but would come back?  It means he would embody amon other folks, other than the Israelites, for a while, then come back, to the Israelites, which he did in 1971.

One Savior Many Forms Over Time

By “he”, I don’t mean an exact replica of the erst form of Jesus, but any embodiment of the Supreme Bein.

It is always a male, so Athena could not have been one.  There is documentation, about the historical Athena, in the Oera Linda Book.  She was a woman of mankind.

We need your comments to this postin, so please click the “leave a comment” link, lower right, and thanks to you, for it!

On Whose Side Is the Muse?

Muses are devils and are against us.  We spurn the muse.

Be so kind as to tell your feelins and thoughts in the “comments”.  Thank you.

Teachin Folks To Listen, Through Film

There has been too much talkin.  In movin pictures, the sum, of talkin, must oft be more, than would be wise, or tasteful, in real life.

Put it differently, oft dialogue must be more, in a movin picture, than sensibility would allow, outside of film.

Many folks have been seen to double the doins, that they saw in movin pictures.  They have doubled those doins in their own lives, oustide of film.

We do not want to only train folks to be talkers.  Folks need to listen more.  How can we train them to listen, without shortenin the dialogue, in a movin picture?

Here is my thought:  show a conversation, amon several folks.  One, of them, speaks not, but only listens.  While the others talk, the camera stays on the listener’s face, not on the speakers’.

Will that help, to train folks to listen?  What is your opinion?

Comment on this thought, I beg of you!   We need your comments to this postin, so please click the “leave a comment” link, lower right, and thanks to you, for it!

Published in: on January 31, 2010 at 3:00 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Film Artists Brainstorm A Movin Picture Here!

This post is just a start, to “kick off” the conversation.  We shall brainstorm the best movin picture ever to have been made.

Here are some parameters, I would like to see, in a movin picture:

1)  Each shot is either a Jung Mandala, or is part of a sequence, that forms a Jungian mandala.

2)  Subliminal messages in the dialogue are all positive affirmations.  For example, if the first word in each sentence, or the most emphasized words in a dialogue, form a hidden sentence:

WE don’t APPRECIATE YOU bein here.

Or:

Phyllis:  WE haven’t seen you in a while, Ted

Glenda:  APPRECIATE what we have been goin through.

Ted:  YOU got it, Sweetys!

Bible’s stories don’t work as films.  For a limited audience they do.  Gibson’s film didn’t work, only the publicity worked.

However, Bible’s stories can be narrated within the context of another story, that happens in another period.

The spoof of Terminator and Jesus worked really well to get a few points across, about the common stereotype of Jesus.  For me, just showin the story itself would have been less interestin.

It could depend upon what the audience is used to.  Folks, who hear Bible’s stories all the time, might be more open to the straight presentation.

Thus, to present a Bible’s story, present a lot of them, and be sure, that they are seen often, and eventually the format will become familiar.

Is the latter true?  It would need to be tested.

Film folks, let me see your comments in this conversation, and thanks to you, in advance, therefor.  We need your comments to this postin, so please click the “leave a comment” link, lower right, and thanks to you, for it!

Expose Of Abuse Of Actors, By Devils

“Hollywood Unmasked”

Here I give to you the first part.  You can find the followin parts in the lower right column of the video page.  We need your comments to this postin, so please click the “leave a comment” link, lower right, and thanks to you, for it!